If, for 21 days, we manually turn the scattered project information of 3-5 people who each manage 8 or more AI projects into one centralized holding view, then at least 2 of the (N) will make at least one concrete portfolio decision based on that unified view (grow, adjust valuation, kill or spin out) and ask for the view to be updated again.
People with many AI projects have information scattered across Lovable, GitHub, Stripe, Google Drive, Notion and email. They cannot see what they own, where value is created or where their attention goes.
For 21 days, the founder collects that information by hand for 3-5 people who each manage 8 or more AI projects, and builds one centralized holding view for each.
1) Clarity: with unified view, can the owner name their most valuable project without opening any other tool? 2) Decision: within 21 days, does the owner make at least one real decision about a project (grow, sell or change valuation) that they say they would not have made without the view?
Each person's project information from Lovable, GitHub, Stripe, Google Analytics, Drive, Notion, email and the interview
Collect it; write one asset profile per project; classify stage, role, value, attention and direction; combine into one view; update weekly
One holding view per person, two reviews, a weekly portfolio update on Day 15, decisions logged
| Criterion | Milestone | Count | Target | Weak | Strong |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shared all projects | By Day 9 | 0 / 3 | 2 of 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Named something new | Day 12 review | 0 / 3 | 2 of 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Made a portfolio decision | Based on the view | 0 / 3 | 2 of 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Asked for updates | After Day 17 | 0 / 3 | 2 of 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Participant | Profile | Projects shared | Interview | Decision made | Update requested |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Engineer-builder | ||||
| P2 | Lovable-builder | ||||
| P3 | Investment-minded builder | ||||
| PN | Total real Number |
Oct 9, 2026 · Discover
-
-
-